The Biggest Dawsons Creek Love Triangle Debate—and Why Fans Still Fight About It

Ah, Dawson's Creek. Remember that show? The one with all the angsty teens and the impossibly good hair? It graced our screens in the late 90s and early 2000s. We watched them grow up. We saw them fall in love. We saw them break up. And oh boy, did they break up a lot.

But the heart of the matter, the eternal question that has launched a thousand forum threads and caused countless friendships to fray, is this: who did Joey Potter really end up with? Or rather, who should she have ended up with?

We're talking, of course, about the legendary Dawson's Creek love triangle. It's a debate so fierce, so passionate, that people are still picking sides today. It’s like asking someone their favorite color, but with higher stakes. Much, much higher stakes.

On one side, you have Dawson Leery himself. The aspiring filmmaker. The sensitive soul. The guy who named his boat after himself. He was Joey's childhood best friend. They shared a special bond. They understood each other on a deep, philosophical level. They talked about movies. A lot. Their connection felt… inevitable, right?

Then there's Pacey Witter. The charming rogue. The class clown with a hidden heart of gold. He was the polar opposite of Dawson. He was impulsive. He was funny. He made Joey laugh. He saw Joey as more than just his best friend's sidekick. He saw her. Really saw her. He challenged her. He made her feel alive. He was the bad boy with a good soul, a classic trope that never fails.

For seasons, we watched Joey navigate these two incredibly different, yet equally compelling, guys. She loved Dawson. She really did. He was her anchor, her safe harbor. He was the one who always got her. Or so she thought. But then Pacey came along, and suddenly, things got… complicated. Sparks flew. Dramatic moments ensued. And we, the viewers, were along for the emotional rollercoaster.

On Dawson's Creek and Love Triangles [Capeside Revisited] - Mostly YA Lit

Fans have been divided for years. The "Team Dawson" folks argued that their intellectual connection, their shared dreams of the future, made them soulmates. They believed their friendship was the foundation for something lasting. They saw Pacey as a distraction, a fun interlude, but not the real deal. Dawson was the one who truly understood Joey's artistic soul.

The "Team Pacey" camp, however, countered that Pacey brought out a side of Joey that Dawson never could. He pushed her boundaries. He showed her a different kind of love, one that was passionate and exciting. He was the one who made her feel truly desired, not just understood. They argued that Dawson's constant introspection and navel-gazing held Joey back. Pacey, on the other hand, liberated her.

And let's not forget the fact that the showrunners themselves seemed to play with this uncertainty. They gave us moments that made us believe in Dawson and Joey. Then they’d hit us with a Pacey and Joey scene that was so electric, so full of chemistry, that you’d question everything you thought you knew. It was masterful manipulation, and we loved every second of it.

I’m A Millennial Who’s Watching Dawson’s Creek For The First Time

"It's not about who was the 'best' boyfriend. It's about who was the best for Joey."

This is where the arguments really heated up. Was Joey meant to be with the guy who knew her since kindergarten and shared her dreams? Or the guy who challenged her and made her discover a new side of herself? It’s a question that goes beyond just who was hotter or who said the funniest lines. It’s about what kind of love we believe in.

Some fans believed that Dawson and Joey were destined. Their friendship was too deep to ignore. It was the kind of love that endures, the kind that you come back to. They saw their eventual romantic pairing as a validation of true love.

Others felt that Pacey was the one who truly helped Joey blossom. He saw her potential, her fire, and encouraged her to embrace it. Their relationship was a journey of self-discovery for Joey, and Pacey was the catalyst. He made her realize she deserved more than just comfortable understanding.

20 years ago, Dawson’s Creek introduced a love triangle that changed

And then there's the whole Jen Lindley factor. While not a direct part of the Joey-Dawson-Pacey triangle, her presence added another layer of complexity and emotional resonance to the show. But that’s a whole other can of worms, isn’t it?

What makes this debate so enduring? Perhaps it's the fact that both Dawson and Pacey had their strengths and weaknesses. Both brought out different things in Joey. Both were, in their own ways, good for her at different times. And maybe, just maybe, the show intended for us to be torn. To see the validity in both arguments.

Personally, and I know this might be an unpopular opinion, I always leaned towards Pacey. There was just something so raw and genuine about his connection with Joey. He saw her flaws and loved her anyway. He wasn’t afraid to be vulnerable. He made her feel seen in a way that Dawson, with all his introspection, sometimes missed.

20 years ago, Dawson’s Creek introduced a love triangle that changed

But I get it. I truly do. The arguments for Dawson are strong. He was her first love. Their history was undeniable. And for a long time, he felt like the obvious choice.

Ultimately, the beauty of the Dawson's Creek love triangle is that it doesn't have a single, easy answer. It reflects the complexities of real relationships. We’ve all been in situations where we’re torn between two people, or two paths. We’ve all had to make difficult choices about who we want in our lives.

So, the next time someone brings up Dawson's Creek, don’t be surprised if the debate over Joey’s true love reignites. It’s a testament to the show’s lasting impact. It’s a reminder of the characters we grew up with. And it’s a fun, harmless way to relive some of that teen drama nostalgia. Now, if you’ll excuse me, I need to go rewatch some Pacey and Joey scenes. For research purposes, of course.